After months of debate and opposition from many universities in the country, the Labour Party-run government will introduce fees for non-EU students. Some 97 votes were cast by the Storting regarding the โpersonal payment for citizens from outside the EEA and Switzerlandโ. An overwhelming 86 were for the introduction, and just 11 were against.
โThe free principle is hereby buried. It is a sad day for students and for equal opportunities,โ said the National Union of Students in Norway leader Maika Marie Godal Dam.
โWhen it really mattered, neither the Socialist Left Party, the Labour Party nor the Center Party was willing to stand up for free higher education,โ she continued.
The move will reportedly free up some 2,600 study places, but the Ministry of Education also estimates that there will be a 70% drop in the number of international students going to Norway.
The vote took place on June 9, but officials in the education committee in the Storting on June 6 made the recommendation officially to parliament, only two parties opposed it โ the communistย Rรธdtย party and theย centristย Venstre.
Rรธdtโs Hege Bae Nyholt, who is currently the head of the education and research committee at the Storting, said it was a day of โmourning and solidarityโ when the recommendation was filed.
Speaking to The PIE News, Godal Dam outlined several concerns about the long term effects the decision could have on the education system.
โI donโt think Norway is introducing tuition fees to make moneyโ
โWeโre greatly concerned that Norwegian HEIs will become less international and diverse with the introduction of tuition fees.
โThe quality of higher education is enhanced when students can be part of international communities where they are exposed to other cultures, perspectives and ideas.
โFurthermore, weโre concerned that this is the first step in a process where more and more people will have to pay for higher education in Norway โ itโs a domino effect,โ she explained.
Speaking to Khrono, the Center Partyโs Marit Knutsdatter Strand said that the management of the new law will be โfollowed closelyโ, especially in regards to the national budget.
โ[This is] not least [about] how the law plays out, both with regard to student groups and various programs and institutions,โ Strand said. โWe take all feedback seriously and will keep a close eye on what happens.โ
The European Students Union, representing the wider student community on the continent, even went as far as to say it โmourned the deathโ of free education in the country.
โThe continuing trend of abolishing free access to education in Europe is deeply concerning. ESU reiterates that education is a fundamental human right irrespective of oneโs origin.
โIt furthermore creates great uncertainty for the international students that have already applied for this academic year, adding even another layer of irresponsibility to what is already a bad political choice,โ Matteo Vespa, ESUโs president, said.
A current student, Miguel Rosas โ who is enrolled on anย urban ecological planning course where 80-90% of students have been international since 1993 โย sat down with the paper to talk about the impending law.
โI donโt think Norway is introducing tuition fees to make money. I think that it is a way to prevent non-EU students from coming here,โ the Venezuelan student claimed.
Rosas told Khronos that he would โnever be able to study this international masterโs program if they were to startโ in this yearโs intake with fees โ it would have been unaffordable.
โThe government and a majority in the Parliament have refused to listen to what consequences this will have for the students and higher education in Norway. We expected far more from our top elected officials,โ Godal Dam added.
This is the second time that a Norwegian government has tried to introduce tuition fees for students outside of the EEA and Switzerland โ a withdrawn attempt took place in 2014 under then PM Erna Solberg, the leader of the Conservative Party and current leader of the opposition.
Many had previously warned of the consequences this would have on Norwayโs system. Study.eu, which in November 2022 predicted the proposed legislation would deter 80% of prospective international students.
Jerome Rickmann, who has extensively researched the topic of tuition fees in Nordic countries, said previous examples of this introduction show itโs not just about the legislation.
โThe government and a majority in the Parliament have refused to listen to what consequences this will haveโ
โThe [initial] drop in numbers was quite massive in Sweden [when fees were introduced in 2011], but when you look a bit behind the numbers and examine over time, it does come down to the individual institution and to the specific school and programs, etc.
โOf course, the larger policy affects the opportunity to recruit, but there is the second side of, โhow much are universities actually leaning into the change?’โ Rickmann told The PIE.
Protests from universities have been ongoing, some have already started to pre-empt the move and have released preliminary fee figuresย โ despite the institutionโs stance on the matter.
Studyportals also released a report on Europe as a study destination in June, which indicated that Norway had seen a 19.1% drop in interest for both bachelorโs and masterโs degrees โ something it said was likely due to the tuition fee introduction.
โWe regret that another financial barrier has been introduced for students aspiring to study in Norway,โ Edwin van Rest, CEO and co-founder of Studyportals, said in a statement.
Theย implementation appears โrushedโ, he said, โcausing uncertainty among our students and putting pressure on our partner universities to adapt within a very short timeframeโ.
โWe believe that the imposition of tuition fees for international students will create unnecessary barriers and may hinder the countryโs efforts to remain a preferred destination for talented individuals seeking a world-class education.โ